Newport Beach, CA
Call to Schedule (949) 274-7110

Introducing Frequency Specific Microcurrent At Anderson Sport and Wellness

At Anderson Sport and Wellness we use Frequency Specific Microcurrent (FSM) devices that are FDA-cleared electrical stimulation machines. This technology provides breakthrough results in as little as one session! Research supports the use, and some of the research goes back to 1996. This tech is called “frequency specific microcurrent,” has been used by thousands of clients and clinicians and is safe, and effective. This machine is regularly used by professional and elite collegiate athletes to stay (or get) healthy and at the peak of their game. This is exponentially better than a TENS machine. Keep reading to learn more.

What Is So Great About Frequency Specific Microcurrent?

How does it work?

Frequency specific microcurrent (FSM) is a safe electrical current signal that to accelerates muscle strengthening and healing of nerves and other tissues at the cellular level. FSM can also stimulate the brain to bring it into balance to optimize healing for concussions and other neurological disorders. Most patients experience significant improvements in symptoms in just one visit. This type of current is specifically targeted to stimulate your body to calm inflammation on nerves and in other tissues with the same power as prescription pain killers, but without the negative effects of that prescription drug. FSM will stimulate the repair of tendons and ligaments, break apart scar tissue, release calcium build-up from tendons, and balance the nervous system profoundly, just to name a few uses.

WHAT THIS BREAKTHROUGH TECHNOLOGY CAN DO:

-Erase pain by treating the source of the pain 

-Calm down inflammation in any tissue 

-Stimulate your body to heal any tissue in the body (a specific program must be designed by your therapist for your individual case). 

-Dramatically accelerate healing after injuries, or surgeries. 

-Decrease muscle soreness and stiffness after a workout or deep tissue massage. 

-Put you into a deeply relaxed state  

-Calm the nervous system imbalances associated with anxiety 

-Balance your nervous system and improve brain function

-Boost your immune system 

WHY DO FSM TREATMENT AT ANDERSON SPORT AND WELLNESS?

Frequency Specific Microcurrent (FSM) is below sensory level stimulation that activates your body cells to accelerate healing, and decrease inflammation. This means you will not feel any tingling, but the frequencies will be doing their work. There is research to support that the frequencies do what they are supposed to do. We see amazing results every day in the clinic. In some cases, painful conditions that have limited movement and function are relieved in just one visit! Most cases require more than one visit, but the overall trend is that our patients are getting well faster and more completely than ever before by adding this technology to our recipe. The technology allows for deep healing and profound shifts, and so do the innovative and comprehensive exercises and manual therapy techniques that we utilize. The recipe to successfully solve problems with pain or recover fast from injury or surgery must include both the technology and research based therapy techniques and exercises. At Anderson Sport and Wellness, we solve problems, we get results. To learn more about us and our clinic click here.

At Anderson Sport and Wellness, all of our therapists have been trained by Carol McMakin, the leading researcher in the field of the use of FSM. She has trained many therapists who work with professional sports including in the NFL and her training is the most comprehensive. We utilize many of her programs for our clients. Additionally, we have developed proprietary FSM programs that only our clients have access to – in order to stimulate and accelerate healing. There are other people who say they use FSM, but many have not been trained comprehensively. They also may not be using the most effective FSM device. The mind of the clinician utilizing FSM is very important. The clinician must correctly identify the root cause of the pain or problem in order for FSM to produce results. We have been effectively identifying root causes and solving physical problems so people can thrive since 2012. Also, FSM is not the only piece of the puzzle. It is important, but it is not everything. Correct exercises and stretches – done the right way, and sometimes expert hands-on care is also needed to get the desired result. At Anderson Sport and Wellness we utilize an approach you won’t find anywhere else because many of our exercises are proprietary. Every clinician is expert-level – with extensive training beyond the basics required to be licensed. The devices we use at Anderson Sport and Wellness include the Neubie by Neufit, the Precision Care FSM device, the iCare device, and the custom care FSM device. Many of our clients purchase FSM devices to use for home so that they can significantly accelerate their recovery from injury or surgery. The first step is to sign up for a comprehensive evaluation at Anderson Sport and Wellness so that Dr. Anderson and her team can evaluate the root cause of your pain or problem and select the appropriate frequencies as well as form a plan involving the correct exercises done the correct way and specialized hands on therapy if that is needed. You will be advised as to the best home device to use to help you get the result you are looking for, and the device will be custom programmed for you based on the findings of the evaluation. To learn more about the cost of custom programming for home devices, scroll down to that section on this page. In addition to this custom program, Dr. Anderson has created a suite of wellness programs to support your active lifestyle using ideally both the custom care and iCare FSM devices. This bundle of programs saves you a lot of money in the long run because it takes care of the future programming needs for most people, as well as including some popular programs such as anti-aging for the skin and weight loss. Most programs run well on the iCare, some are best on the custom care. If a program involves stimulating healing for neve and/or spinal cord (this includes programs to calm the nervous system and ease or eliminate migraines), the custom care is best. To view the complete list of wellness program offerings please click here.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A TENS or NMES UNIT OR INTERFERENTIAL STIMULATION AND FSM?

Frequency specific microcurrent actually stimulates the body to heal itself, and it can stimulate nerves that are under functioning, it can balance the brain. There are frequency specific microcurrent programs we use in our clinic weekly which accelerate concussion recovery dramatically for example. Frequency specific microcurrent can turn on the Vagus nerve, which is a “master nerve” that when it is turned on helps keep you in rest and digest and heal mode, rather than fight or flight. You won’t feel any tingling when frequency specific microcurrent is running. But you will feel the affect of the current, as it helps solve your pain or function problem. TENS units and interferential stimulation units provide pain relief by creating a strong sensation for the brain to pay attention to that blocks the messages that were causing the brain to produce a pain signal. So a person with pain who puts on a TENS or Interferential stimulation unit is just blocking the perception of pain, but not actually solving the cause of the pain. An NMES unit activates muscles to contract, this is usually fairly uncomfortable with most units at higher activation levels (the levels needed to get a sleepy muscle to fire). The Neubie can activate sleepy and/or weak muscles and under functioning nerves in a way that is much more comfortable and powerful than any NMES machine on the market.

Frequency specific microcurrent treatment accelerates relief of pain and stiffness

With frequency specific microcurrent machines we can directly stimulate your nerves and brain so that muscles and fascia/connective tissue of your body relax – allowing massage and other physical therapy techniques to go deeper and be more effective. It takes hours of training on the devices and also expert understanding of injuries and how to rehabilitate them to use the machines correctly. We have put in the time to learn how to use the technology and are now finding that we can literally accomplish in 30 minutes what used to take 3 hours. Inflammation of nerves or soft tissues can be quieted in just 4 minutes. This is very helpful when inflammation is causing pain or limitation in movement. The mechanism by which this happens at the cellular level and the efficacy has been verified with high-quality research.

The Neubie and frequency specific microcurrent treatment builds strength in ways not previously possible – to eliminate pain and accelerate injury recovery or performance gains in sport

When there has been surgery, or pain for more than 3 months in an area, the nerves that control the affected muscles can get sleepy, and sometimes nothing wakes them up – even the highest quality physical therapy exercises or massage techniques. Those sleepy nerves control the muscles, so those muscles never come back on completely. That weakness leads to chronic pain. But the Neubie and the Precision Care frequency specific microcurrent machines can wake up those sleepy nerves so the muscles will activate again optimally, eliminating pain. The machines accomplish this in different ways, and certain types of problems need one machine over the other. The good news is, we know how and when to use either one! Strength gains are also accelerated with the application of the Neubie because the direct current stimulation causes your body to activate muscle fibers that would otherwise sit on the sidelines. In one session using the Neubie we can accomplish what would normally take 2 weeks. This is speeding up the timeline for recovery for clients substantially if they are rehabilitating an injury, and also allowing for improvements that would not be possible without the Neubie.

Frequency specific microcurrent treatment helps the brain heal FAST

Symptoms from concussions and post-concussion syndrome are due to the injured part of the brain being underactive, and the other areas compensating by being over-active. This puts tremendous stress on the brain and the nervous system as a whole, causing symptoms of brain fog, headache, muscle tension, mood changes, nausea and more. All these symptoms get in the way of daily functioning and also interfere with physical therapy progress. Using the the Precision Care frequency specific microcurrent machines allows many of these symptoms to be eliminated so that physical therapy can be done to retrain the brain. Each machine has special uses and we have learned when and how and which machine to use to solve a given problem. We regularly see brain fog, nausea, and muscle tension as well as other symptoms be eliminated in just one treatment.

Neubie treatment and Frequency specific microcurrent treatment helps solve chronic pain

Chronic pain is highly complex because it involves changes in the way the brain and nervous system interact with the muscles and other body tissues. When pain has been present in a body area for more than 3 months these changes occur and in order to eliminate pain, neuronal pathways in the brain must be retrained and the way the nerves related to the brain must also be changed. Recovery is not easy, but it is possible. At Anderson Sport and Wellness we incorporate a multifaceted, research based approach to solving chronic pain. This approach works – most of our clients are able to return to their everyday life and recreational activities that they previously could not do because of pain in 3-6 months. Most clients with chronic pain require the purchase of a custom care FSM machine for home use in order to get this type of result. This is in addition to coming to Anderson Sport and Wellness for physical therapy. Clinical research has shown that if patients with chronic pain use the device daily in addition to coming to physical therapy for the brain training exercises and body training exercises that are required, they can recover completely in as little as three months.

Research

This is not a complete list, there are more articles.

Pain relief, chronic pain, pain management, myofascial pain, fibromyalgia, Shingles burn patients

  • AMF, El Shiwi. “EFFECT OF MAGNETIC FIELD IN TREATMENT OF LOWER BACK MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.” Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine 38.1 (2014): 95-109. 
  • Armstrong, Kelly, Raman Gokal, and Todd Todorsky. “Treatment of chronic post surgical pain using micro-current point stimulation applied to C-section scars.” OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine 4.3 (2019): 1-15. 
  • Binder, Allan, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendinitis: a double-blind controlled assessment.” The Lancet 323.8379 (1984): 695-698. 
  • Eun, Jong Shin, et al. “The effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields therapy for treatment of chronic pain.” Journal of the Korean Pain Society 17.2 (2004): 141-145. 
  • Fouda, A., Hamida Refai, and N. Mohammed. “Low level laser therapy versus pulsed electromagnetic filed for inactivation of myofascial trigger points.” Am J Res Commun 1.3 (2013): 68-78. 
  • Fouda, Atef. “Comparison between four treatment modalities for active myofascial triggers points.” pain 16 (2014): 19. 
  • Gaynor, James S., Sean Hagberg, and Blake T. Gurfein. “Veterinary applications of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy.” Research in veterinary science 119 (2018): 1-8. 
  • Giovale, Massimo, et al. “Low-energy pulsed electromagnetic field therapy reduces pain in fibromyalgia: A randomized single-blind controlled pilot study.” Rheumatology and Immunology Research 3.2 (2022): 77-83. 
  • Gokal, R., et al. “The successful treatment of chronic pain using micro-current point stimulation applied to scars.” Int J Complement Alt Med 10.3 (2017): 00333. 
  • Gur, Ali. “Physical therapy modalities in management of fibromyalgia.” Current pharmaceutical design 12.1 (2006): 29-35. 
  • Havas, Magda. “Comment on: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in theTreatment of Pain and Other Symptoms in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Study.” Bioelectromagnetics 40.611 (2019). 
  • Honda, Yuichiro, et al. “Effects of physical-agent pain relief modalities for fibromyalgia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Pain Research & Management 2018 (2018). 
  • Huang, Li-qun, et al. “Clinical update of pulsed electromagnetic fields on osteoporosis.” Chinese medical journal 121.20 (2008): 2095-2099. 
  • Lumiere, Reviewed by Kathleen. “Review of Frequency-Specific Microcurrent in Pain Management.” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 17.11 (2011): 1091-1092. 
  • Markov, Marko S. “Expanding use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapies.” Electromagnetic biology and medicine 26.3 (2007): 257-274. 
  • McMakin, C. “c0080 Frequency-specific microcurrent.”  
  • McMakin, Carolyn R. “Microcurrent therapy: a novel treatment method for chronic low back myofascial pain.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 8.2 (2004): 143-153. 
  • McMakin, Carolyn R., Walter M. Gregory, and Terry M. Phillips. “Cytokine changes with microcurrent treatment of fibromyalgia associated with cervical spine trauma.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 9.3 (2005): 169-176. 
  • McMakin, Carolyn. “Microcurrent therapy in the treatment of fibromyalgia.” Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Practitioner’s Guide to Treatment. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone (2003): 179-206. 
  • McMakin, Carolyn. “Microcurrent treatment of myofascial pain in the head, neck, and face.” Topics in Clinical Chiropractic 5 (1998): 29-35. 
  • McPartland, John M., and David G. Simons. “Myofascial trigger points: translating molecular theory into manual therapy.” Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 14.4 (2006): 232-239. 
  • Multanen, Juhani, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the treatment of pain and other symptoms in fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled study.” Bioelectromagnetics 39.5 (2018): 405-413. 
  • Paolucci, Teresa, et al. “Electromagnetic field therapy: a rehabilitative perspective in the management of musculoskeletal pain–a systematic review.” Journal of Pain Research (2020): 1385-1400. 
  • Pawluk, William. “Pain management with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment.” Am Pain Soc. Vol. 20. 2003. 
  • Reilly, Wayne G., and Paul Mannion. “TREATMENT OF JUVENILE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS WITH INTERFERENTIAL FREQUENCY MICROCURRENT THERAPY (FSM) AND MONITORING WITH HEMAVIEW TM FOLLOWING MEDICATION ASSOCIATED-MORBIDITY: A CASE STUDY.” 
  • Schneider, Michael, et al. “Chiropractic management of fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.” Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 32.1 (2009): 25-40. 
  • Simons, David G. “Neuromusculoskeletal medicine—dawning of a new day.” Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 14.4 (2006): 199-201. 
  • Simons, David G. “Review of Microanalytical in vivo study of biochemical milieu of myofascial trigger points.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 10.1 (2006): 10-11. 
  • Simons, David G., and Jan Dommerholt. “Myofascial trigger points and myofascial pain syndrome: a critical review of recent literature.” Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 14.4 (2006): 125E-171E. 
  • Simpson, Charles A. “Complementary medicine in chronic pain treatment.” Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics 17.2 (2006): 451-472. 
  • Storari, Marco, et al. “Chronic Facial Pain in Fibromyalgia: May ElectroMagnetic Field Represent a Promising New Therapy? A Pilot Randomized-Controlled Study.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20.1 (2022): 391. 
  • Strauch, Berish, et al. “Evidence-based use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in clinical plastic surgery.” Aesthetic Surgery Journal 29.2 (2009): 135-143. 
  • Sutbeyaz, Serap Tomruk, et al. “Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical study.” The Clinical journal of pain 25.8 (2009): 722-728. 
  • Whitaker, Julian. “Put a Stop to Shingles Pain Put a Stop to Shingles Pain.” 
  • Wilson, H., J. Hamilton, and R. Madhok. “A case of shingles mimicking carpal tunnel syndrome.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 60.7 (2001): 719-719. 
  • Xiao, Jing, et al. “Clinical efficacy of electromagnetic field therapy combined with traditional Chinese pain-reducing paste in myofascial pain syndrome.” World journal of clinical cases 10.32 (2022): 11753. 
  • Yang, Xiaotian, et al. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, stiffness, physical function, and quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.” Physical therapy 100.7 (2020): 1118-1131. 

Auto immune disorders, Multiple sclerosis, Blood pressure, Inflammation

  • Afshari, Daryoush, et al. “Evaluation of pulsing magnetic field effects on paresthesia in multiple sclerosis patients, a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial.” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 149 (2016): 171-174. 
  • Chan, Andrew K., et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields reduce acute inflammation in the injured rat‐tail intervertebral disc.” JOR spine 2.4 (2019): e1069. 
  • Feig, Stephen A., et al. “Summary of the American college for advancement in medicine November 2004 conference on emerging concepts in immunology.” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2 (2005): 121-124. 
  • Ghione, Sergio, et al. “Human head exposure to a 37 Hz electromagnetic field: effects on blood pressure, somatosensory perception, and related parameters.” Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 25.3 (2004): 167-175. 
  • Granja-Domínguez, Anabel, et al. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on fatigue, walking performance, depression, and quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.” Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 26.5 (2022): 100449. 
  • Guerriero, Fabio, and Giovanni Ricevuti. “Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation modulates autoimmunity and immune responses: a possible immuno-modulatory therapeutic effect in neurodegenerative diseases.” Neural Regeneration Research 11.12 (2016): 1888. 
  • Hochsprung, A., et al. “Effectiveness of monopolar dielectric transmission of pulsed electromagnetic fields for multiple sclerosis–related pain: A pilot study.” Neurología (English Edition) 36.6 (2021): 433-439. 
  • Kim, Chul-Ho, et al. “The impact of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on blood pressure and circulating nitric oxide levels: a double blind, randomized study in subjects with metabolic syndrome.” Blood Pressure 29.1 (2020): 47-54. 
  • Kubat, Nicole J., John Moffett, and Linley M. Fray. “Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment on programmed resolution of inflammation pathway markers in human cells in culture.” Journal of inflammation research (2015): 59-69. 
  • Larsson, H. B. W., et al. “In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis.” Magnetic resonance imaging 10.1 (1992): 7-12. 
  • Lauer, Vincent. “Resolving apparent inconsistencies in effects of electromagnetic waves on cancer and auto-immunity.” (2014). 
  • Lee, Bok Y., et al. “Ultra-low microcurrent in the management of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and chronic wounds: report of twelve cases and discussion of mechanism of action.” International Journal of Medical Sciences 7.1 (2010): 29. 
  • Lee, Jeong-Woo, et al. “The effects of microcurrents on inflammatory reaction induced by ultraviolet irradiation.” Journal of Physical Therapy Science 23.4 (2011): 693-696. 
  • Leskovvitz, Eric. “Energy-based therapies in neurology: the example of Therapeutic Touch.” 
  • MARTINEZ BELLO, Daniel. “The physical rehabilitation of muscle weakness and lost quality of movement in patients with multiple sclerosis.” (2007). 
  • Odell, Robert H., and Richard E. Sorgnard. “Anti-inflammatory effects of electronic signal treatment.” Pain Physician 11.6 (2008): 891. 
  • Piatkowski, Joachim, Simone Kern, and Tjalf Ziemssen. “Effect of BEMER magnetic field therapy on the level of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.” The Journal of alternative and complementary Medicine 15.5 (2009): 507-511. 
  • Rasouli, Jonathan, et al. “Attenuation of interleukin-1beta by pulsed electromagnetic fields after traumatic brain injury.” Neuroscience letters 519.1 (2012): 4-8. 
  • Richards, T. L., et al. “Double-blind study of pulsing magnetic field effects on multiple sclerosis.” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 3.1 (1997): 21-29. 
  • Richards, Todd L., et al. “Bioelectromagnetic applications for multiple sclerosis.” Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 9.3 (1998): 659-674. 
  • Rikk, János, et al. “Influence of pulsing electromagnetic field therapy on resting blood pressure in aging adults.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 32.2 (2013): 165-172. 
  • Rohde, Christine H., et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields reduce postoperative interleukin-1β, pain, and inflammation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in TRAM flap breast reconstruction patients.” Plastic and reconstructive surgery 135.5 (2015): 808e-817e. 
  • Rosado, Maria Manuela, et al. “Immune-modulating perspectives for low frequency electromagnetic fields in innate immunity.” Frontiers in public health 6 (2018): 85. 
  • Ross, Christina L., and Benjamin S. Harrison. “An introduction to electromagnetic field therapy and immune function: a brief history and current status.” J Sci Appl: BioMed 3 (2015): 18-29. 
  • Ross, Christina L., Dennis C. Ang, and Graça Almeida-Porada. “Targeting mesenchymal stromal cells/pericytes (MSCs) with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has the potential to treat rheumatoid arthritis.” Frontiers in immunology 10 (2019): 266. 
  • Ross, Christina L., et al. “The use of pulsed electromagnetic field to modulate inflammation and improve tissue regeneration: A review.” Bioelectricity 1.4 (2019): 247-259. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven, and Lea C. Dann. “Resolution of Lhermitte’s sign in multiple sclerosis by treatment with weak electromagnetic fields.” International Journal of Neuroscience 81.1-2 (1995): 215-224. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven, and Lea C. Dann. “Weak electromagnetic fields attenuate tremor in multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 79.3-4 (1994): 199-212. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Chronic relapsing multiple sclerosis: a case of rapid recovery by application of weak electromagnetic fields.” International Journal of Neuroscience 82.3-4 (1995): 223-242. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Effect of weak electromagnetic fields on body image perception in patients with multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 86.1-2 (1996): 79-85. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “II. Therapeutic effects of alternating current pulsed electromagnetic fields in multiple sclerosis.” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 3.4 (1997): 365-386. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Immediate recovery of cognitive functions and resolution of fatigue by treatment with weak electromagnetic fields in a patient with multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 90.1-2 (1997): 59-74. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Impairment of depth perception in multiple sclerosis is improved by treatment with AC pulsed electromagnetic fields.” International journal of neuroscience 98.1-2 (1999): 83-94. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Long term beneficial effects of weak electromagnetic fields in multiple sclerosis.” International Journal of Neuroscience 83.1-2 (1995): 45-57. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Progressive cognitive improvement in multiple sclerosis from treatment with electromagnetic fields.” International journal of neuroscience 89.1-2 (1997): 39-51. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Resolution of dysarthria in multiple sclerosis by treatment with weak electromagnetic fields.” International Journal of Neuroscience 83.1-2 (1995): 81-92. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Resolution of sleep paralysis by weak electromagnetic fields in a patient with multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 90.3-4 (1997): 145-157. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Suicidal Behavior is Attenuated in Patientis with Multiple Sclerosis by Treatment with Electromagnetic Fields.” International journal of neuroscience 87.1-2 (1996): 5-15. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Treatment with AC pulsed electromagnetic fields normalizes the latency of the visual evoked response in a multiple sclerosis patient with optic atrophy.” International journal of neuroscience 93.3-4 (1998): 239-250. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Treatment with electromagnetic fields improves dual-task performance (talking while walking) in multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 92.1-2 (1997): 95-102. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Treatment with electromagnetic fields reverses the long-term clinical course of a patient with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 90.3-4 (1997): 177-185. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Treatment with weak electromagnetic fields improves fatigue associated with multiple sclerosis.” International Journal of Neuroscience 84.1-4 (1996): 177-186. 
  • Sandyk, Reuven. “Yawning and stretching-a behavioral syndrome associated with transcranial application of electromagnetic fields in multiple sclerosis.” International journal of neuroscience 95.1-2 (1998): 107-113. 
  • Servodio Iammarrone, Clemente, et al. “Is there a role of pulsed electromagnetic fields in management of patellofemoral pain syndrome? Randomized controlled study at one year follow‐up.” Bioelectromagnetics 37.2 (2016): 81-88. 
  • Shewale, Vishal U., Smita S. Aher, and Ravindranath B. Saudagar. “Review on Neuropathic Pain.” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 9.3-s (2019): 820-824. 
  • Smith, Thomas L., Donna Wong‐Gibbons, and Jane Maultsby. “Microcirculatory effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields.” Journal of Orthopaedic research 22.1 (2004): 80-84. 
  • Stößlein, Bernd AC, and Kim PC Kuypers. “Self-rated recovery and mood before and after resistance training and muscle microcurrent application.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022): 836695. 
  • Vincenzi, Fabrizio, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field exposure reduces hypoxia and inflammation damage in neuron‐like and microglial cells.” Journal of Cellular Physiology 232.5 (2017): 1200-1208. 

Vestibular System

  • Allen, A., et al. “Impact of electromagnetic fields on human vestibular system and standing balance: Pilot results and future developments.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 120. No. 1. IOP Publishing, 2016. 
  • Balbani, Aracy Pereira Silveira, and Jair Cortez Montovani. “Mobile phones: influence on auditory and vestibular systems.” Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia 74 (2008): 125-131. 
  • Colciago, Alessandra, et al. “Transcriptomic profile reveals deregulation of hearing-loss related genes in vestibular schwannoma cells following electromagnetic field exposure.” Cells 10.7 (2021): 1840. 
  • Elliott, Melissa Jo. “On the Level.” (1917). 
  • Fisher, Kenneth D., et al. “Sensitivity of Auditory and Vestibular Systems to Stimuli Other Than Sound and Motion.” Available NTIS, AD-A013 617 (1975). 
  • International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. “Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).” Health physics 118.5 (2020): 483-524. 
  • Lai, Henry. “Biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field.” Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering 10 (2005): 1-8. 
  • Lebovitz, Robert M. “Detection of weak electromagnetic radiation by the mammalian vestibulocochlear apparatus.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 247.1 (1975): 182-193. 
  • Liu, Wei, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field affects the development of postmenopausal osteoporotic women with vertebral fractures.” BioMed Research International 2021 (2021). 
  • Miller, Claire Prener, et al. “Transcranial low‐frequency pulsating electromagnetic fields (T‐PEMF) as post‐concussion syndrome treatment.” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 142.6 (2020): 597-604. 
  • Mohamed, M. A., M. M. Abdelrazek, and M. S. Zewita. “A Survey of Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields.” International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI) 11.1 (2014): 167. 
  • Okechukwu, Chidiebere Emmanuel. “Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on neurophysiology.” Advances in Human Biology 10.1 (2020): 6-10. 
  • Palekar, Tushar J., and Nigel Joel Gonsalves. “Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Cervical and Lumbosacral Spine-Related Pain: A Systematic Review.” Medical Journal of Dr. DY Patil University (2023). 
  • Pau, Hans Wilhelm, et al. “Can electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones stimulate the vestibular organ?.” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 132.1 (2005): 43-49. 
  • Reiter, Russel J. “Static and extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure: reported effects on the circadian production of melatonin.” Journal of cellular biochemistry 51.4 (1993): 394-403. 
  • van Rongen, Eric, et al. “Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on the human nervous system.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 12.8 (2009): 572-597. 
  • Zaffe, Davide, et al. “Rabbit bone behavior after orthodontic and pulsed low-frequency electromagnetic field treatments.” Electro-and Magnetobiology 17.1 (1998): 87-98. 
Concussion, Neurological stroke, low back pain, radiation induced fibrosis

1 Abdelhalim, Nermeen Mohamed, Ahmed Fathy Samhan, and Walid Kamal Abdelbasset. “Short-Term impacts of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in middle-aged university’s employees with non-specific low back pain: A pilot study.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 35.4 (2019): 987

2 Alshamali, W., and A. Burahmah. “A New Non-Pharmacological Approach in Treatment of Post-Herpetic Neuralgia.” Chron Pain Manag 6 (2022): 143

3 Andrade, Renato, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy effectiveness in low back pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.” Porto biomedical journal 1.5 (2016): 156-163

4 Campos, Samantha, et al. “The evaluation of vasodilation and stress properties with the application of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) on the Equine Distal Limb.” (2023

5 Cichon, Natalia, et al. “Evaluation of the effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field on the levels of some inflammatory cytokines in post-stroke patients.” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51.11 (2019

6 Elshiwi, Ahmed Mohamed, et al. “Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on nonspecific low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial.” Brazilian journal of physical therapy 23.3 (2019): 244-249

7 Gessi, Stefania, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field and relief of hypoxia‐induced neuronal cell death: the signaling pathway.” Journal of cellular physiology 234.9 (2019): 15089-15097

8 Grant, Gerald, Ruggero Cadossi, and Gary Steinberg. “Protection against focal cerebral ischemia following exposure to a pulsed electromagnetic field.” Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 15.3 (1994): 205-216

9 Hambly, Mark F., and Vert Mooney. “Effect of smoking and pulsed electromagnetic fields on intradiscal pH in rabbits.” Spine 17.6 (1992): S83-S85

10 Harper, Wayne L., et al. “An open-label pilot study of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome pain.” International medical case reports journal (2014): 13-22

11 Kondrot, Edward C. “Neuromodulazione E Riabilitione Visiva: La Strada Per Il Neu-roenhancement Visivo Nel Paziente Ipovedente

12 Koopman, Joseph SHA, Dorien H. Vrinten, and Albert JM van Wijck. “Efficacy of microcurrent therapy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain: a pilot study.” The Clinical journal of pain 25.6 (2009): 495-499

13 Lee, Hae-June, et al. “Effects of intermediate frequency electromagnetic fields: A review of animal studies.” International Journal of Radiation Biology 99.2 (2023): 166-182

14 Miller, Claire Prener, et al. “Transcranial low‐frequency pulsating electromagnetic fields (T‐PEMF) as post‐concussion syndrome treatment.” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 142.6 (2020): 597-604

15 Mollica, Adriano, et al. “Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of concussion: a systematic review.” Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 24.5 (2021): 803-812

16 Moya Gómez, Amanda, et al. “Electromagnetic field as a treatment for cerebral ischemic stroke.” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 8 (2021): 742596

17 Oke, K. I., and P. F. A. Umebese. “Evaluation of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic therapy in the treatment of back pain: a randomized controlled trial in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.” West indian medical journal 62.3 (2013

18 Omar, Aziza Sayed, Magdy Ahmed Awadalla, and Maii Abd El‐Latif. “Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of patients with discogenic lumbar radiculopathy.” International journal of rheumatic diseases 15.5 (2012): e101-e108

19 Rasouli, Jonathan, et al. “Attenuation of interleukin-1beta by pulsed electromagnetic fields after traumatic brain injury.” Neuroscience letters 519.1 (2012): 4-8

20 Saggini, R., et al. “Rehabilitative treatment for low back pain with external pulsed electromagnetic fields.” International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology 22.3_suppl (2009): 25-28

21 Shetty, Gautam M., Pallavi Rawat, and Anjali Sharma. “Effect of adjuvant frequency-specific microcurrents on pain and disability in patients treated with physical rehabilitation for neck and low back pain.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 24.4 (2020): 168-175

22 Sorrell, Robert Gordon, et al. “Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.” Journal of Pain Research (2018): 1209-1222

23 Vincenzi, Fabrizio, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field exposure reduces hypoxia and inflammation damage in neuron‐like and microglial cells.” Journal of Cellular Physiology 232.5 (2017): 1200-1208

24 Vincenzi, Fabrizio, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulate HIF-1α-independent VEGF release in 1321N1 human astrocytes protecting neuron-like SH-SY5Y cells from oxygen-glucose deprivation.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21.21 (2020): 8053

25 Walker, Janet L., et al. “Electromagnetic field treatment of nerve crush injury in a rat model: effect of signal configuration on functional recovery.” Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 28.4 (2007): 256-263

26 Wang, Chunyan, et al. “Lowfrequency pulsed electromagnetic field promotes functional recovery, reduces inflammation and oxidative stress, and enhances HSP70 expression following spinal cord injury.” Molecular Medicine Reports 19.3 (2019): 1687-1693

27 Wu, Li, et al. “Simulation study on continuous casting process of Al/Al bimetal round billet under multi-electromagnetic.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 33. No. 1. IOP Publishing, 2012

Delayed onset muscle soreness, torticollis, 

1 Allen, Jennifer D., Carl G. Mattacola, and David H. Perrin. “Effect of microcurrent stimulation on delayed-onset muscle soreness: a double-blind comparison.” Journal of Athletic Training 34.4 (1999): 334

2 Bearer, Cynthia F. “Electromagnetic fields and infant incubators.” Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 49.5 (1994): 352-354

3 Cho, Sung Cheol, et al. “Therapeutic effect of microcurrent therapy in a rat model of secondary lymphedema.” Annals of Palliative Medicine (2023): apm-23

4 Curtis, Denise, et al. “The efficacy of frequency specific microcurrent therapy on delayed onset muscle soreness.” Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 14.3 (2010): 272-279

5 de Freitas, Diego Galace, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic field and exercises in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 95.2 (2014): 345-352

6 Jeon, Hye-Seon, et al. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on delayed-onset muscle soreness in biceps brachii.” Physical Therapy in Sport 16.1 (2015): 34-39

7 Joshi, Narahari, and Araque Haydeé. “Electromagnetic fields and torticollis therapy with electroacupuncture.” Medical Acupuncture 22.2 (2010): 111-115

8 Kroeling, Peter, et al. “A Cochrane review of electrotherapy for mechanical neck disorders.” Spine 30.21 (2005): E641-E648

9 Kwon, Dong Rak, and Gi Young Park. “Efficacy of microcurrent therapy in infants with congenital muscular torticollis involving the entire sternocleidomastoid muscle: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation 28.10 (2014): 983-991

10 Liller, Tamara K. “Review of: The Phenomenon of Pain by Serge Marchand.” (2013): 201-202

11 Meyer, Robert E., Tim E. Aldrich, and Clay E. Easterly. “Effects of noise and electromagnetic fields on reproductive outcomes.” Environmental Health Perspectives 81 (1989): 193-200

12 Sargent, Barbara, et al. “Congenital muscular torticollis: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice.” Pediatrics 144.2 (2019

13 Sarhan, Reda, Enas Elsayed, and Eman Samir Fayez. “Pulsed Electromagnetic Therapy Improves Functional Recovery in Children with Erb’s Palsy.” Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy 7.1 (2013): 42

14 Stößlein, Bernd AC, and Kim PC Kuypers. “Self-rated recovery and mood before and after resistance training and muscle microcurrent application.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022): 836695

15 Thompson, Regina, and Sandra L. Kaplan. “Frequency-specific microcurrent for treatment of longstanding congenital muscular torticollis.” Pediatric Physical Therapy 31.2 (2019): E8-E15

16 Trofè, Aurelio, et al. “Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) on Muscular Activation during Cycling: A Single-Blind Controlled Pilot Study.” Healthcare. Vol. 11. No. 6. MDPI, 2023

17 Wu, Yi-Lin, et al. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field on differentiation of HUES-17 human embryonic stem cell line.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15.8 (2014): 14180-14190

Skin care, anti-aging, scar 

1 Ahmadian, Shahin, Saeed Rezaei Zarchi, and Bahram Bolouri. “Effects of extremely‐low‐frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on collagen synthesis in rat skin.” Biotechnology and applied biochemistry 43.2 (2006): 71-75

2 Albertini, Alberto, et al. “Protective effect of low frequency low energy pulsing electromagnetic fields on acute experimental myocardial infarcts in rats.” Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 20.6 (1999): 372-377

3 Athanasiou, Athanasios, et al. “The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on secondary skin wound healing: an experimental study.” Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 28.5 (2007): 362-368

4 Callaghan, Matthew J., et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate normal and diabetic wound healing by increasing endogenous FGF-2 release.” Plastic and reconstructive surgery 121.1 (2008): 130-141

5 Capelli, Enrica, et al. “Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field is able to modulate miRNAs in an experimental cell model of Alzheimer’s disease.” Journalf healthcare engineering 2017 (2017

6 Castro, Fabiene CB, et al. “Effects of microcurrent application alone or in combination with topical Hypericum perforatum L. and Arnica montana L. on surgically induced wound healing in Wistar rats.” Homeopathy 101.03 (2012): 147-153

7 Chaikin, Laurie, et al. “Microcurrent stimulation in the treatment of dry and wet macular degeneration.” Clinical ophthalmology (2015): 2345-2353

8 Cheing, Gladys Lai‐Ying, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) promote early wound healing and myofibroblast proliferation in diabetic rats.” Bioelectromagnetics 35.3 (2014): 161-169

9 Ciombor, D. McK, et al. “Modification of osteoarthritis by pulsed electromagnetic field—a morphological study.” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 11.6 (2003): 455-462

10 Davis, Paul. “Microcurrent.” A modern healthcare modality. Rehab Ther Prod Rev 10 (1992): 62-66

de Abreu Freitas, Rodrigo Pegado, et al. “Comparative study of Low-level laser therapy and microcurrent on the healing of skin burns in rats.” Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences 36.1 (2014): 5-10

11 Rodrigo  P., Aline  B., Anderson  R., Ana Maria  D., & Wouber Hérickson D. “Comparative study of Low-level laser therapy and microcurrent on the healing of skin burns in rats.” Acta Scientiarum. Health Sciences 36, no. 1 (2014):5-10. Redalyc, https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=

12 De Loecker, W., P. H. Delport, and N. Cheng. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on rat skin metabolism.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 982.1 (1989): 9-14

13 Delport, P. H., et al. “The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on metabolism in rat skin.” Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 14.1-3 (1985): 93-98

14 Gaynor, James S., Sean Hagberg, and Blake T. Gurfein. “Veterinary applications of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy.” Research in veterinary science 119 (2018): 1-8

15 Ghersetich, Ilaria, et al. “Ultrastructural study of hyaluronic acid before and after the use of a pulsed electromagnetic field, electrorydesis, in the treatment of wrinkles.” International journal of dermatology 33.9 (1994): 661-663

16 Goudarzi, Iran, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate wound healing in the skin of diabetic rats.” Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, The Society for Physical Regulation in Biology and Medicine, The European Bioelectromagnetics Association 31.4 (2010): 318-323

17Guerriero, Fabio, et al. “Effectiveness of an innovative pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation in healing of untreatable skin ulcers in the frail elderly: two case reports.” Case reports in dermatological medicine 2015 (2015

18 Houghton, Pamela E. “Clinical trials involving biphasic pulsed current, microcurrent, and/or low-intensity direct current.” Advances in wound care 3.2 (2014): 166-183

19 Huang, Liyi, et al. “Enhanced effect of combining bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) to promote recovery after spinal cord injury in mice.” MedComm 3.3 (2022): e160

20 Huegel, Julianne, et al. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy at different frequencies and durations on rotator cuff tendon-to-bone healing in a rat model.” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27.3 (2018): 553-560

21 Hug, Kerstin, and Martin Röösli. “Therapeutic effects of whole‐body devices applying pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF): A systematic literature review.” Bioelectromagnetics 33.2 (2012): 95-105

22 Ieran, M., et al. “Effect of low frequency pulsing electromagnetic fields on skin ulcers of venous origin in humans: a double‐blind study.” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 8.2 (1990): 276-282

23 Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei, et al. “Short-term effects of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic field on corneas with alkaline burns in rabbits.” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 53.12 (2012): 7881-7888

24 Kim, Yu-Mi, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase pigmentation through the p-ERK/p-p38 pathway in zebrafish (Danio rerio).” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19.10 (2018): 3211

25 Kinney, Brian M. “Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in plastic surgery.” Aesthetic Surgery Journal 25.1 (2005): 87-91

26 Krishnan, Gayathri, et al. “Enhanced skin permeation of naltrexone by pulsed electromagnetic fields in human skin in vitro.” Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 99.6 (2010): 2724-2731

27 Lee, Young Bok, et al. “Effects of multi-polar radiofrequency and pulsed electromagnetic field treatment in Koreans: case series and survey study.” Journal of dermatological treatment 25.4 (2014): 310-313

28 Leoci, Raffaella, et al. “Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on prostate volume and vascularity in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a pilot study in a canine model.” The Prostate 74.11 (2014): 1132-1141

29 Luigi, Cristiano, and Pratellesi Tiziano. “Mechanisms of Action And Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) in Medicine.” J Med Res Surg 1.6 (2020): 1-4

30 Mäenpää, Helena, et al. “Does microcurrent stimulation increase the range of movement of ankle dorsiflexion in children with cerebral palsy?.” Disability and Rehabilitation 26.11 (2004): 669-677

31 Mayrovitz, Harvey N., and Parry B. Larsen. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on skin microvascular blood perfusion.” Wounds 4.5 (1992): 197-202

32 McMakin, Carolyn R., and James L. Oschman. “Visceral and somatic disorders: tissue softening with frequency-specific microcurrent.” The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 19.2 (2013): 170-177

33 McPartland, John M., and David G. Simons. “Myofascial trigger points: translating molecular theory into manual therapy.” Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 14.4 (2006): 232-239

34 Mercola, Joseph M., and Daniel L. Kirsch. “The basis for microcurrent electrical therapy in conventional medical practice.” Journal of Advancement in medicine 8.2 (1995): 107-120

35 Nair, Harikrishna KR. “Microcurrent as an adjunct therapy to accelerate chronic wound healing and reduce patient pain.” Journal of wound care 27.5 (2018): 296-306

36 Nobile, Vincenzo, Angela Michelotti, and Enza Cestone. “A home-based eyebrows lifting effect using a novel device that emits electrostatic pulses containing RF energy, resulting in high frequency, low level transdermal microcurrent pulsations: Double blind, randomized clinical study of efficacy and safety.” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy 18.4 (2016): 234-238

37 Oliveira, Thais Cristina Ferraz de, et al. “Effects of multipolar radiofrequency and pulsed electromagnetic field treatment for face and neck rejuvenation.” Dermatology research and practice 2017 (2017

38 Patiño, Osvaldo, et al. “Pulsed electromagnetic fields in experimental cutaneous wound healing in rats.” The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation 17.6 (1996): 528-531

39 Poltawski, Leon, and Tim Watson. “Bioelectricity and microcurrent therapy for tissue healing–a narrative review.” Physical Therapy Reviews 14.2 (2009): 104-114

40 Sarhan, Tarek M., and Maher A. Doghem. “Effect of microcurrent skin patch on the epidural fentanyl requirements for post operative pain relief of total hip arthroplasty.” Middle East J Anesthesiol 20.3 (2009): 411-5

41 Schuhfried, O., et al. “The effects of low-dosed and high-dosed low-frequency electromagnetic fields on microcirculation and skin temperature in healthy subjects.” International journal of sports medicine (2005): 886-890

42 Sharp, Stephen J., Mylene T. Huynh, and Rosemarie Filart. “Frequency-specific microcurrent as adjunctive therapy for three wounded warriors.” Medical Acupuncture 31.3 (2019): 189-192

43 Sharrard, W. J. “A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures.” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume 72.3 (1990): 347-355

44 Sisken, B. F., et al. “Stimulation of rat sciatic nerve regeneration with pulsed electromagnetic fields.” Brain research 485.2 (1989): 309-316

45 Stiller, M. J., et al. “A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial.” British Journal of Dermatology 127.2 (1992): 147-154

46 Strauch, Berish, et al. “Evidence-based use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in clinical plastic surgery.” Aesthetic Surgery Journal 29.2 (2009): 135-143

47 Sugimoto, M., et al. “Optimum microcurrent stimulation intensity for galvanotaxis in human fibroblasts.” Journal of wound care 21.1 (2012): 5-10

48 Sun, Jiahui, et al. “Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on peripheral blood circulation in people with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.” Bioelectromagnetics 37.5 (2016): 290-297

49 Ugarte-Ruiz, Maria, et al. “Exploring the oxidative, antimicrobial and genomic properties of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from poultry.” Research in veterinary science 119 (2018): 170-175

50 Vadalà, Maria, et al. “Mechanisms and therapeutic effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in oncology.” Cancer medicine 5.11 (2016): 3128-3139

51 Veronese, Sheila, et al. “Vacuum and electromagnetic fields treatment to regenerate a diffuse mature facial scar caused by sulfuric acid assault.” Bioengineering 9.12 (2022): 799. 

Information regarding purchase of a personal FSM device

There are two options for personal home use of Frequency Specific Microcurrent. One is the custom care device, a FDA approved, clinical grade device. The other is the iCare, which is classified as a wellness device under FDA guidelines. If patients purchase either device, we will program the device for our patients.

The custom care device is the one we use primarily in the clinic. We use the iCare also, but it has limits. The iCare cannot effectively treat nerve pain or pain coming from the spinal cord. A Custom Care device is required for that. But the iCare can stimulate healing for any other body tissue so it has a wide range of health benefits it can help produce. If you would like to purchase an iCare, scroll to the end to see the purchase link

PRICE BREAKDOWN FOR THE CUSTOM CARE FSM DEVICE:

This is an FDA approved, clinical grade device. It must be programmed by a clinician in order for it to work.

$420.00 for initial evaluation (60 minutes) with our expert level physical therapist – to identify root causes and establish a personalized plan. This can be done in person or virtual. If you would like treatment on the same day as your evaluation, the total price is $750.00.

$2,299.38 purchase of custom care device (this is the cost of the device plus tax and shipping)

You have three different payment options for programming the custom care device listed below.

Bronze Custom Programming Package: Includes initial programming of the device with your unique program utilizing ASW proprietary programs. Your program will be created based on your comprehensive evaluation with us (a comprehensive evaluation is $750.00 and includes treatment the same day at our clinic, the evaluation only and no treatment that same day is $420.00). You also will receive instructions regarding how and when to use the device to optimize your health and accelerate healing….. $600.00

Silver Wellness Super Bundle Programming Package: Includes everything in the bronze package PLUS our FSM Wellness Super Bundle. Click Here to learn more about what this includes. Basically the FSM wellness super bundle includes programming of the device with ASW proprietary protocols to improve immune function, accelerate injury healing for a variety of injuries, mental wellness and general health viatlity programs, as well as your custom program.) For more information about the wellness super bundle, click here. Just like with the bronze package, your custom program will be created based on your comprehensive evaluation with us (The evaluation cost is separate). You also will receive instructions regarding how and when to use the device to optimize your health and accelerate healing….. $1,200.00

Gold Personalized Programming Package: Includes everything in the Silver Wellness Super Bundle PLUS 4 hours of additional programming of your device to be used at a later time (programming is done in 15, 30, 45, and 60 minute increments, depending on the work that needs to be done. Your custom program will be created based on your comprehensive evaluation with us (The evaluation cost is separate). You also will receive instructions regarding how and when to use the device to optimize your health and accelerate healing….. $2,760.00 ($115.00/15 minutes)

If you are not able to get to our clinic we can do a virtual evaluation and mail the device to you with your personalized programming.

The prices listed above do not include your comprehensive evaluation. The price of our evaluation is $750.00 and it can be done in person or virtual. If you would like only the evaluation and no treatment that day, the evaluation is $420.00.

Subsequent programming of the device for updated needs ranges from $150.00-$600.00 per episode depending on the extent of the work (more complicated cases require more time to program). A quote on the cost will be given prior to new programming. The best value if you will be utilizing frequent programming for your condition is the purchase the gold programming package, in which case programming ranges from $115.00-$460.00 per episode of programming.

PRICE BREAKDOWN FOR THE iCARE FSM DEVICE:

If you chose to purchase an iCare, click on your choice of link (this is for the device only and does not include the programming). It is best to have the device shipped to you, and then download the app. As soon as you download the app, let us know, and we can push the programs to you through the cloud. That way when you get your iCare device you can start using it ASAP.  It usually takes 5 business days to arrive. You can contact us to purchase your choice of programming – we do not begin programming until we have received payment. If you purchase both devices (custom care and iCare), or just one device, the programming fee is the same: you have the above listed Bronze, Silver, or Gold options.

You are purchasing the device and the app directly from the manufacturer, we just provide the link for your convenience.

$250.00 – iCare Package (pay $15.00 monthly for app) 

https://buy.stripe.com/

$400.00 – iCare Package – 1 Year Subscription to the app and includes the iCare device.

https://buy.stripe.com/bIY5nP8RNf7l3WE00d 

Click to view and purchase programming options
Click to purchase a personal Custom Care device

Questions? Click HERE to learn more

Learn more about Treatment with our Breakthrough Tech
Our Location
Facebook Instagram Linkedin Pinterest Youtube
Medical disclaimer
All information on this website is intended for instruction and informational purposes only. The authors are not responsible for any harm or injury that may result. Significant injury risk is possible if you do not follow due diligence and seek suitable professional advice about your injury. No guarantees of specific results are expressly made or implied on this website.

Privacy Policy

All Rights Reserved.